March 26th, 2014

Defra’s ex WRATE-ed guide

SELCHP_incinerator_-_power_plant,_Rotherhithe_-_geograph.org.uk_-_333740

by Ann Ballinger

 

Incineration might be worse than landfill. Although not an unfamiliar conclusion for us at Eunomia – we suggested as much in a report written for Friends of the Earth eight years ago – it’s rather more surprising to hear Defra echoing it in a recent publication. Hitherto the department seems to have regarded the environmental benefits as incontrovertible.

Read more on Defra’s ex WRATE-ed guide…


January 31st, 2014

Goodbye, England’s rise: why have household recycling rates stalled?

Graph

by Roy Hathaway

 

One of the biggest questions facing UK waste policy makers and commentators is: why have recycling rates in England levelled off?

Until recently it was assumed – not least by Government – that the steady increase in UK recycling which marked the last decade would continue indefinitely, thanks mainly to the landfill tax escalator.

Read more on Goodbye, England’s rise: why have household recycling rates stalled?…


January 21st, 2014

Preferential treatment: choosing between recycling and incineration

Movinggrate

by Ad Lansink

 

Which poses the greatest threat to our future: climate change resulting in global warming due to CO2 emissions; or a shortage of resources resulting in possible economic instability, as the demands of an ever-increasing global population outstrip diminishing primary supply?

Read more on Preferential treatment: choosing between recycling and incineration…


November 1st, 2013

Burning bridges: what does Covanta’s departure mean?

PFI_Projects

by Peter Jones

 

The last act of Covanta’s ill-fated attempt to enter the UK energy from waste (EfW) market played out this month, as the company settled its case over the award of the Merseyside Recycling & Waste Authority (MRWA) waste disposal contract. Now it only remains for the company to find a buyer or a partner for its UK EfW business.

Read more on Burning bridges: what does Covanta’s departure mean?…


October 11th, 2013

Planning petition: waste infrastructure and the Aarhus Convention

European_Parliament

by Jane Green

 

I had never heard of the European Parliament’s Committee on Petitions until recently. Yet this little-known arm of the Parliament, by agreeing to examine whether the way that waste infrastructure planning decisions are made in the UK is compliant with the Aarhus convention, may be starting off a process that has some profound implications, both for the planning process and for waste management.

Read more on Planning petition: waste infrastructure and the Aarhus Convention…